Complacency not excuse enough to cover United’s apparent shortcomings

> Complacency can’t be an issue by itself 
> We seem to expect too much from United
> Norwich deserve credit for fightback

There is a temptation to level what might seem a fair criticism at Manchester United and their generally underwhelming performances this season but, in truth, the isolated idea that the side is too complacent in winning positions or in situations where they are expected to coast is a touch unfair and, simply put, a bit lazy. Indeed, the problem, if there is one, seems much more deep-rooted than that. If, as they say, complacency is a running theme, then surely United would have recognised this sooner and changed their attitude and approach?

Initially, it made sense. There have been cases where teams in a seemingly good position have faltered when they’ve allowed apparent complacency to creep in but, for United, the accusation has been all-too-frequent that it has to be something else. Complacency can’t be the issue by itself at least, if it is an issue at all.

What Manchester United are right now is a very good team made up of individuals that are either, but not limited to, (i) outstanding, (ii) experienced, (iii) young or just (iv) competent squad players; most are probably two of the above. United have plenty of these and not one senior team player is excluded; but it still in the end contributes (only?) to a ‘very good’ team. Because United have had better sides under the management of Sir Alex – but we already know that. Yes, it’s one capable of winning matches and they remain strong enough to be regarded as one of Europe’s best, but it is important to recognise that any eleven they put out this season can be beaten and that they don’t have a divine right to claim three points because the superiority of their squad compared to others is notably much less than seasons past.

What could be put down to complacency might just be the fact that the other team are also quite good; for Manchester United to squander a winning position or have it threatened, it doesn’t necessarily take them to play badly, it just takes the other to play well. Same applies to when they are seen to have reduced the tempo of their game; it might just be that the opposition have responded well or have been invigorated for whatever reason because they, like United, have specific objectives in a football match and there is no such thing as unlimited time.

It’s all hypothetical. It boils down to how you view a situation. Norwich fans would feel inclined to praise their players for an impressive response to going a goal down after Paul Scholes had put United 1-0 up and commend their determination and fortitude. When Grant Holt equalised for the Canaries, United fans may moan and hiss as if to say “I told you so” and blame the team for their apparent drop in concentration or their contentedness with a narrow lead. In truth, Norwich’s admirable resistance was more their work than United’s and it’s no surprise that they’re currently sitting eighth in the Premier League table – people seemed to have forgotten that they’ve actually played well this season and so ended the game as the better team. Moreover, it is difficult to imagine a team like United – or any other for that matter – having that sort of attitude when only 1-0 up, thinking the game is over once they’re in the lead. It is also important to distinguish what is meant by ‘complacency’; keeping the ball and playing with slightly less caution when ahead isn’t being complacent. It’s defending a lead. It’s another way to register three points. It’s common sense.

In cases where a team have actually performed pretty poorly for 90 minutes, or most of the game, and it’s mostly through the fault of their own, complacency just doesn’t come into it. You cannot be content when you’ve looked absolutely bobbins. Against Ajax in the second leg of the last 32 of the Europa League, with a 1-0 and a 3-0 aggregate lead, United’s players were accused of being complacent. Not necessarily true. They were gutless and uninspiring; and surely, they can’t have allowed complacency to creep in when they didn’t look for a moment as if they were satisfied with what they had.

Ajax might be of a less quality to what we saw in the 90s, and floundering slightly in the Eredivisie, but, like United, they were a Champions League side who had finished third (and only because of dramatic goal difference swing which saw Lyon progress as they plundered seven goals). The Dutch side pulled a goal back and their chance of snatching it was unlikely, but not improbable or unthinkable. And still, United continued to waver to the point where they conceded a second. You can’t put that down to complacency, surely not? Here, Ajax should be praised for their fightback. And so here goes: well done Ajax. And well done, Norwich. You can congratulate the other team even if you suppose complacency is an issue, but it depends on what you’re congratulating them for. The result (if you decide to assume the flawed, popular thing) or the performance (if you believe they’ve played well largely through their own work)? In this case, the latter. Why? Definitely not because of the ‘c’ word. No, no. Because, let’s face it, ‘complacency’ is a load of rubbish.


7 responses to “Complacency not excuse enough to cover United’s apparent shortcomings”

  1. richard says :

    What fucking nonsense…It’s one thing to have the naysayers from the press and other clubs attach the word poorly to United but from a so-called fan!! At times United got behind the Norwich defense with what was simply fantastic football. Had they taken the MANY chances created the score line could have been embarrassing for Norwich. I am for one fucking sick of reading this absolute garbage and before you respond, exercise your right not to, I’ll add that I won’t read this blog any longer. I have followed United for 46 years now and I have had my fill of complainers like you. Grow up–you have been spoiled fella.

    • The Gaffer says :

      “Complainer”? Where do I criticise United? ‘Shortcomings’ in the title is preceded by ‘apparent’ – that’s *their* opinion, not mine. Here, I praise other teams and explicitly point out that we’ve been quite good, just that others have too. Really, then, you should be agreeing – but it seems you’ve either got the wrong end or you’re just a numpty.

      The latter, I’d say. Before you respond, exercise your right not to, because, really, you aren’t a clever one. Ta-ra.

    • Stephen says :

      I too agree I hate the word “complacement” being banded anywhere near any UNITED side. But over the past few years I have noticed a less ruthless streak to the team in general. Perfect example City in the FA Cup, 3-0 up at half time, playing against 10 men and for what happened at Old Trafford not 3 months previous we should have buried them bastards at the council house and in some small way repay the millions of reds worldwide for the disasterous result previous. But this did not occur, thus (I don’t want to sound spoilt) leaving a little bit of a sour taste in mouth and more importantly giving the Berties a bit of a boost at an important time of the season. So come on Reds lets get the bit between the teeth, kill teams off and give the blue noses fuck all to cheer about.

  2. Lars says :

    Great post. It seems every time United is not bending opponents over and slapping them silly, the word ‘complacent’ pops up. It’s good to see that there *might* be other reasons – such as the ones you list up in this piece. I mean, if complacency really is the reason for our ‘bad’ performances, wouldn’t our squad be awfully unprofessional? It wouldn’t make sense.

  3. Dazzlar says :

    It is a fair argument however I feel that there was a sense of complacency about yesterdays performance. They simply did not push on after the goal and let Norwich come into the game more and more. It is interesting to note that once Norwich got the equaliser we immediately upped our game and created several chances.

  4. beetle5 says :

    I agree with Dazzler. However, as was said in the post, keeping the ball more and being slightly less adventurous is one way of getting three points. Once Utd couldn’t do that any more – they had to bomb forward and take chances. Whilst it worked yesterday, Norwich could easily have broken away and scored the winner themselves. Not necessarily complacency. (although, as I said, I also thought I saw signs of complacency from various players throughout the match, particularly in the middle of the park). Not a great performance, but a win which could prove vital. A few players, Nani and Jones in particular, still look in need of minutes after their injuries.

  5. orez says :

    This is an awesome post. I myself have been guilty on many occasions of blaming it on complacency, but your article makes a lot of sense. The team isn’t as good and the only reason that we are in it is due to SAF. At the same the transfers of several recent years weren’t that good IMO. Not to bash anyone, but many of our players were bought for some good money, but their returns were subpar.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: